Prophecy

We are seeing a significant erosion of our liberties in America, as George W. Bush, using the threat of terrorism as an excuse, is systematically broadening surveillance, limiting travel, detaining citizens without charge or access to legal counsel, and eliminating privacy as a right.

184. Jobless recovery (12/1)

Postby kathaksung » Tue Apr 05, 2005 6:51 pm

184. Jobless recovery (12/1)

Bush is a favorite of inside group. They want him to stay for the 2nd term. But he did nothing good. So the only way inside group can do is to give him a prosperous economy. That's why media beat the drum to propaganda the economy is recovering "Growth is now super-super strong compared to super strong,'', "U.S. 3rd-Qtr GDP Grew at 8.2% Rate, Fastest Since '84". Do you feel this super-super strong recovery? Pay-check raised? Employment fully? Or only impression from media?

A fully recovery means high employment, rising income. Company must expand their business. All these need capital, will cause a rising interest in financial market. But FBI is holding a large amount of real estate property. Any interest rising will increase their monthly payment to the loan, and will also cause a housing market price collapse. Nothing can hurt Feds' interest. So Federal interest maintains at 1%. And Bush administration can only invent a new word," jobless recovery". But jobless recovery can't cheat people. That's why I am persecuted so violently.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

213. Heated housing market and heated persecution (3/14)

Postby kathaksung » Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:24 pm

213. Heated housing market and heated persecution (3/14)

I posted message on 3/9 to reveal a series trap. Next day, my wife was invited to a dinner party held by an air liner company. In a prize drawing, she got a free air ticket to Asio effective within a year. My wife has attended such kind of party almost every year. She never had the luck to draw a prize. This is the only one.

I think it's a show off by Feds. That they can arrange case anytime. (A trip is often an important part in a framed case. And the bait I knew they used were: relative's invitation; lucrative business chance; bargain deal; this time is a free ticket.) But the ticket doesn't mean an immediate trip. So I expect there will be other traps coming.

I learned it from Mercury News on same day (3/4) when they issue the intimidation news. The first title on first page was: "Area home sales blooming". It said, "One prospective buyer had 10 competitors for a condo in San Jose's Willow Glen neighborhood priced at $489,000. He offered $530,000 but didn't get the home.....". It's a signal that Feds is heating the house market to sell their real estates property. The competitors, I think, mostly are support group of Feds used to push up a market. Because only in a rising market, Feds can sell their houses quickly at a good price.

Nobody has such ability to manipulate a house market like Feds. From Federal Reserve to fix a low interest rate to the people who pretended to be house buyers. Only Feds has such resource.

One way they used to push the house market is to raise the fuel price, I allege. Because the high cost of housing, many people have to find the house in nearby area. They drive about 50 to 70 miles or so each day to work in silicon valley. The high gas price will force this group of people back to Valley market.

Despite the downturn of Silicon Valley economy after outbreak of dot com bubble in 2000, the housing market is steadily going an up way. What is the relationship of this blooming market reported on 3/4 to the other recent economy reports? Re: "Valley job scene still the pits", "Jobs lost since the height of the boom in December 2000: 232,500, or 21.7% of the total." (2/28/04, S.J.M.N.)
"Car, truck sales fall 12.2% in valley", "The decline in new-vehicle purchases reflected a 'challenging year' for the South Bay economy. Statewide, sales fell 5 percent." (3/3/04, S.J.M.N.).

As I said in message "180. Beware of housing bubble" and "184. Jobless recovery (12/1)", an economy recovery is needed for Bush's second term. They planned this a year ago. Tax cut, weak dollar, all targets to increase demand, expand production and employment. But the result will boost the interest rate which will hurt D.o.J.(FBI and DEA) whom had invested a lot in real estate properties started with my case. Feds check up that recovery so far. But the pressure is heavy. I feel the heat of persecution when I read the news of a bloom area house market. Week ends used to be the time I went out shopping. Yesterday(Saturday, 3/13) afternoon, I was blocked again by slow procession which at last forced me giving up the surfing. I think it was an effort to force me out to shopping. What was there outside waited for me? I don't know. Probably violence in rogue's way because they are in a hurry.

I'll try my best to keep up a message each five days in my home page. I may slow down to post in other individual forum site due to heavy harassment.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

221. Things sensitive, follow up (4/14)

Postby kathaksung » Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:29 pm

221. Things sensitive, follow up (4/14)

4. Hurry to sell real estate property

Feds are hurry up to finish my case in a rogues way. Because they have to open the employment gate for Bush's election within months. Which will cause the rising of interest rate and the break up of housing bubble. They are pushing to sell their houses invested in my case. They might have sold already most of houses they had in other areas. But they still hold a lot around my area because my case isn't finished. How can they sell so many houses quickly in a short period? Only six months left for president election.

After the article "Housing: Bay area bidding war returns"(3/4, S.J.M.N.), "Homes, realty sales surge 30%"(3/19, S.J.M.N), there was an article aimed at a quick sale on 4/11: "The symptoms of home fever. "

It said, "As offers pour in, cutthroat market a boon for sellers". It gave "Advice for home buyers" that " ** Get pre-approved - not just pre- qualified for a mortgage before you want to make an offer on a home. ** Work with a real estate agent who has successfully guided many clients through multiple-offer situations. ** Request that your agent present your offer in person to the seller and his agent. ** Include an "earnest money" deposit of at least 3 percent of the purchase price when you present your offer. ** If a seller makes a counteroffer on price or terms, be prepared to respond quickly......."

That's how Feds to manipulate a house market. They flame buyers by media, by "competitor buyers", by "real estate agents". This time it's urgent, so they push for a quick sale before interest rate rising. They advice you get everything ready, so when a deal is offered, little time to take a sensible consideration, no chance of regret, because you put the "earnest money" on it already, or even make decision for you because you've authorized the real estate agent represent for you in person already.

Why I say push "by real estate agent"? I think many real estate agents work for Feds. Because housing is a very important way for Feds to loot money. They develope it to their main business. The profit is huge.

The man who lives in B house is a real estate agent, I think. Only in my block, he has at least two properties. Once I saw he had two real estate shelf boards in his backyard, (the shelf used to hang "house for sale"). That "for sale" board later appeared in next lane, before the house of alleged "Feds head-quarter" I talked about in "133. Strong reaction ". It was a cover up sale after I revealed that house was a head office of Feds. And if that house belongs to the owner of B house, then he has at least 3 properties in my block. If people had that man as their real estate agent, he works for whose interest? Customer's or Feds'?
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

221. Things sensitive, follow up (4/14)

Postby kathaksung » Wed May 04, 2005 8:17 pm

221. Things sensitive, follow up (4/14/04)

4. Hurry to sell real estate property

Feds are hurry up to finish my case in a rogues way. Because they have to open the employment gate for Bush's election within months. Which will cause the rising of interest rate and the break up of housing bubble. They are pushing to sell their houses invested in my case. They might have sold already most of houses they had in other areas. But they still hold a lot around my area because my case isn't finished. How can they sell so many houses quickly in a short period? Only six months left for president election.

After the article "Housing: Bay area bidding war returns"(3/4, S.J.M.N.), "Homes, realty sales surge 30%"(3/19, S.J.M.N), there was an article aimed at a quick sale on 4/11: "The symptoms of home fever. "

It said, "As offers pour in, cutthroat market a boon for sellers". It gave "Advice for home buyers" that " ** Get pre-approved - not just pre- qualified for a mortgage before you want to make an offer on a home. ** Work with a real estate agent who has successfully guided many clients through multiple-offer situations. ** Request that your agent present your offer in person to the seller and his agent. ** Include an "earnest money" deposit of at least 3 percent of the purchase price when you present your offer. ** If a seller makes a counteroffer on price or terms, be prepared to respond quickly......."

That's how Feds to manipulate a house market. They flame buyers by media, by "competitor buyers", by "real estate agents". This time it's urgent, so they push for a quick sale before interest rate rising. They advice you get everything ready, so when a deal is offered, little time to take a sensible consideration, no chance of regret, because you put the "earnest money" on it already, or even make decision for you because you've authorized the real estate agent represent for you in person already.

Why I say push "by real estate agent"? I think many real estate agents work for Feds. Because housing is a very important way for Feds to loot money. They develope it to their main business. The profit is huge.

The man who lives in B house is a real estate agent, I think. Only in my block, he has at least two properties. Once I saw he had two real estate shelf boards in his backyard, (the shelf used to hang "house for sale"). That "for sale" board later appeared in next lane, before the house of alleged "Feds head-quarter" I talked about in "133. Strong reaction ". It was a cover up sale after I revealed that house was a head office of Feds. And if that house belongs to the owner of B house, then he has at least 3 properties in my block. If people had that man as their real estate agent, he works for whose interest? Customer's or Feds'?
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

251. Mortgage rate and September plot (8/29)

Postby kathaksung » Wed May 04, 2005 8:20 pm

251. Mortgage rate and September plot (8/29)

In message "245. Framed case and "terror attack" (8/4)" I talked about Bush passed a signal to China that US was ready for another framed case on 7/30, and Ridge raised alarm code in some financial area to orange colour on 8/1. I pointed out it was an intimidation from D.O.J. to financial group not to raise interest rate too quick because Feds have a large investment in real estates.

I think my revelation was very accurate. We can see since then there was a confusion. Feds hurried throwing out a case that they arrested an Al Qaida man in Pakistan. In his computer they found the chart of those financial buildings. Feds justified the terror warning by this information. And then the information was revealed being four years old; and then the news said information was renewed half year ago; and then we knew the arrested Al Qaida computer expert was an informant.Informant? So Feds could explain in the way whatever they wanted to.

But as I said in message on 8/4, "It was probably an intimidation: "Don't raise interest rate too quick.We have big interest in housing market." Although Federal Reserve still raised the benchmark interest rate a quarter point on 8/10, the interest of Bonds went in opposite direction: downwards. Because it is linked to home mortgage rate.

In a report on 8/21, World Journal said, "Despite the Federal Reserve Bank has raised the interest rate, the rate of home mortgage loan, instead, is sliding downwards. In July, the interest rate of 30 years' fixed mortgage loan was between 6.21% to 5.98%. But this week, it descends to 5.81%."

The conflict way of rising prime rate vs dropping home loan rate proves what I said is right. The terror bombing intimidation works. The financial group who controls market, have to give way to the interest of Feds. Which creates a strange phenomenon: The rate of home loans drops while the main interest rate is rising.

Then what happens to 9/21, the next date when Federal Reserve will have another meeting and likely to raise the benchmark rate another quarter of point? The contradictory mortgage rate can't maintain too long.

As usual, Feds frame new drug cases and arrange parties. It almost becomes routine for them recently. One is on 9/2, my father's birthday. The other one is Dr. Wang's wife's birthday. ( I had spelled Dr. Wang as Dr. Huang in message 241, 242. I only knew his legal name should be Wang when I saw his invitation note a few days ago.) Feds make it a big one. My wife has booked hotel rooms for Dr. Wang's relatives from Singapore for the party. Feds tries to net as many people as possible.

It's convenient to frame a drug case. Secret police are skilled for it. China and US has practised for years. Singapore and Philippines are the new partners.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

272. Federal fund rate (12/4/04)

Postby kathaksung » Sun May 15, 2005 7:06 pm

272. Federal fund rate (12/4/04)

I started to post in Internet in September 2000. Frightened by my revelation, D.O.J. determined to eliminate me and the people who knew the story. On 11/12/ 2000, article "Killing Pablo" in Mercury News was an announcement that Feds had planned a mass killing in the name of a "drug case". (see "62. Plot") Chinese secret police was bribed to frame the "drug case". We saw all these in the incident of collision of EP-3 spy plane in HaiNan, China in April 2001, and ended at 6/11/01 when McVeigh was executed. For that framed case, both directors of FBI and DEA resigned. (see messages 61, 62, 63, 64) Since then, the attempt to frame a case on me had never stopped. But the first decision was made in November, 2000.

In my case Feds emptied my community. They also started to buy in a lot of real estate property since 1997. The buy in movement continued until 2000. When they built up a case, they built up a business opportunity for themselves as well. In the end of 2000, D.O.J. determined to finish the case by a big plot. Of course, they needed to sell out the houses held in their hand.

Then we saw there was a steep decline of Federal fund rate in 2001. Started from January that year, there were 11 rate cut, almost once each month. At the end of 2001, Federal fund rate dropped to well under 2% from 6% when the year began. It later touched the bottom of 1% and stayed there until mid 2004. The 30 year fixed mortgage rate followed the Federal rate dropping to the low point of 5.3%. Which created a booming housing market. Federal Reserve did good to co-operate with D.O.J..

Generally, it was easy for Feds to murder a target. "So what, they even killed President Kennedy." But things went beyond all expectations. The plots failed one after another with my revelation. And Federal Reserve had to maintain that historical low rate for nearly three years to the demand of D.O.J. that at any time when Feds finished the case, they could sold all their property quickly at a high profit margin.

How absurd that rate was? In article "Rate hikes likely to continue" (S.J.M.N. 11/11/04), it said, 'By historical standards, interest rates are still far below normal levels. After adjusting for inflation, the "real" federal funds rate is barely equal to zero after being solidly negative for the past two years. On average, the federal funds rate has been about three percentage points above the rate of inflation.

Many analysts have said they think a "normal" or "neutral" rate under today's circumstances would be about 4 percent." It is 2% right now.

The negative Federal fund rate created two bubbles in stock market and housing market. Which is under a big consumer credit bubble. I can foresee there is a dark future of US economy.

The low interest rate also makes US bond lose attraction to foreign investors. Dollar devalue rapidly recently. An inflation is coming. To raise interest rate to the normal is unavoidable. D.O.J. has successfully blocked this tendency for years. In August it even intimidated the financial group by terror bombing alert. (see "251. Mortgage rate and September plot (8/29)")
The terror blackmail works. The 30 years fixed mortgage rate in July was 6.2% while the Federal fund rate was 1.25%. After August terror intimidation, though Federal reserve still raised the bench mark rate three times to 2%, the 30 year fixed mortgage rate dropped back to its low point at 5.32% on 11/20.

But when people of the world started to abandon US dollars, D.O.J. may not resist it any more. That's why I saw Bush called Chinese President on 11/8, six days after his re-election. A new plot has been planned. They are in a hurry.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

216. Poison tap water (3/29/04)

Postby kathaksung » Wed May 25, 2005 7:03 pm

216. Poison tap water (3/29/04)

When the food was poisoned and symptoms were observed, I always changed the food to identify which one was poisoned. Then threw the poisoned food away.

In later Feb. and early March, for more than a week, I found the colour of my urine kept being in red. I couldn't identify the source however I changed the food. At last, I concluded it must be something very basic I had to have everyday - water. I went to super market, bought a bottle of water. It worked. The urine colour turned into plain yellow from red.

After I found the water bought from water store was poisoned which caused bone-ache, I abandoned it and turned into tap water. (see "187. Drinking water ") Now they even poisoned the running water. How do they confine the poisoned water to my residence, I don't know. But certainly it's great advantage for them to do so when most, if not all, the houses in communty are all their property.

What water the rest of my families drink? I noticed they stopped to buy bottle water and turn back to the water which is bought from water store. I don't touch it because I don't want Feds switch back to poison that water again.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

309. Isotope, mole, cancer (5/7/05)

Postby kathaksung » Sat Jun 04, 2005 8:01 pm

309. Isotope, mole, cancer (5/7/05)

If you read my messages from begining, you know that my problem started with isotope money.

Isotope is a good tracer. It is invisible. It can be only detected by special instrument. People are not aware of it even they are traced by isotope. I think it is vastly used by Feds. But isotope also will hurt health. It's radioactive. So there is another usage other than tracing - killing. The victim used to have a cancer. It's a murder disguised in natural disease.

It was about in 2001,(?) when I was shaving one day, I sudenly noticed there were many new moles on my cheek. I used to take a side sleep. Mostly I slept on my right side, there were many moles on my right cheek. There were less moles on my left cheek because I slept less on that side.

The fresh black moles alarmed me. I thought Feds contaminated my pillow with radioactive material which would cause a skin cancer. (I'll use "isotope" for radioactive material hereafter) I changed the pillow and slept with clothes or towel underneath my head which I often washed. It works. Small moles faded away. Big mole, turned into pale black. It's no more the scaring oil-black colour.

Since Feds poisoned the tap water, I used to buy bottled water or got the water from other source such like gas station or rest room of store. But even these water were often found poisoned because I depended on other's drive which always guided me to the market where poisoned water and food were prepared in advance. So I used to test the water to make sure if it was "clean".

Started from February this year, I started to have cough after meal. It was a sympton that food contanimated with isotope. But I failed to identify the source. Once my wife had the supper at same time with me. She coughed after meal. My wife rarely touched the dish I cooked. The only common food we had was rice. But it was me cooked the rice. The ingredients were rice and water, both verified "clean" beforehand, what happened? I was puzzled.

Soon I solved the problem. A few days later I suddenly found there were many moles on the back of my hands. I was immediately aware of that the tap water was contaminated by isotope. I do the dish wash by hands everyday. (We never use dish-washer) Though I avoid to drink tap water, I wash with it. Both hands soaked in isotope tap water caused a skin cancer sympton - moles. It also explains why we coughed after eating the rice. Though I cooked rice with clean water, I washed it with isotope tap water which contaminated the rice. I wash with tap water to save "clean water".

I abandoned tap water right away. It works, one month later, the black mole on the back of my hands faded away. It reminds me of the radiation clean work by Feds last December. (see "274. Radiation", "275. Radiation 2 ") and Judge's cough which led him into the jail. . (see "298. Intimidate Judge (3/22/05)"
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

310. Poison and cover up (5/12/05)

Postby kathaksung » Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:39 pm

310. Poison and cover up (5/12/05)

From mid-2003, Feds intensified poison tactic on me. At first they sent the poisoned food in the name of free food, gift food. I felt apparent unwell after eating this kind of food. I became very careful on eating. My father in law, neglecting my warning, was found having a cancer in later 2003. He passed away on March 2004. (see #167.)

As I started to buy my own food, Feds started to poison the food in Super market too. At first in small quantity, then expanded it to various food and in large quantity. Although they tried to restrict me in limit store by guided drive, the poisoned food still hurt other innocent customers. Right now my wife just refuse a food drive. Leave me no choice but the nearest market I can reach on foot. You can imagine what kind of food are there for me.

Psychological propaganda is an important procedure in Feds' work. For 2004 campaign, media continuosly threw out "poll results" that Bush led over Kerry by 2% to justify a rigged election. To cover up the large scale poison up, media also let out aricles to justify.

The major poison Feds uses recently is isotope which will cause a cough. It won't be cured by coughing medicine or anti-virus medicine because the cause is not a bacteria or virus, it's isotope. Then there is such an article to justify the phenominon.

"Despite vaccinations, cases of whooping cough surging".
"CDC officials say the massive increase in whooping cough is primarily in adolescents who have gone at least five years since their shots, which is explained by waning immunity. Adults also are getting whooping cough." (S.J.M.N. 4/11/05)

Of course, doctors and patients will never have dreamed of the isotope. They have to take the explanation of newspaper and government officials.

Here are other cover up aricles I kept:

"The produce likely to have pesticides". "12 fruits and vegetables are the most contaminated by pesticides." (S.J.M.N. 10/21/03)

"COMMON GROCERIES HAVE TOXIC TRACES". A wide variety of food in US supermarkets (fish, pork, duck, cheese, butter, milk, chicken, ice cream and eggs) is contaminated with tiny doses of toxic flame retardants - PBDE. (S.J.M.N. 9/2/04)

"Restaurants to warn about fish". "Compaies settle lawsuit over high levels of mercury in some species" (S.J.M.N. 2/5/05)

"FARMS, Chemicals showdown". "California is still far from phasing out methyl bromide. Millions of pounds used per year." "Hazards: Highly toxic. Causes brain and neutrological damage; high concentrations can cause respiratory or cardia failure." (S.J.M.N. 2/9/05)

"Rocket-Fuel Chemical Found in Breast Milk
Wed Feb 23, 7:55 AM ETBy Marla Cone Times Staff Writer

Breast milk from 36 women in 18 states, including California, was sampled, and all contained traces of perchlorate.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=s ... breastmilk

Also reported by S.J.M.N. 2/24/05: "Breast milk toxin studied"

Recently, I failed several times to enter my own homepage in AOL. It said, "
Sorry, We Can't Find That Page". It hadn't happened before. It may signal that Feds will finish the case soon in a rougue's way.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

311. A large scale poison project (5/17/05)

Postby kathaksung » Sat Jun 25, 2005 7:11 pm

311. A large scale poison project (5/17/05)

In last message #310, I referred cover up articles from Mercury News. They followed tightly to the poison plan of Feds.

In message #167, 168 (posted on 9/26/03, 10/6/03) I talked about poisoned vegetable. Then on 10/21, there was a news said vegetables were contaminated by pesticides.

Next year, Feds expanded their poison plan into supermarkets. The article "COMMON GROCERIES HAVE TOXIC TRACES"(9/2/04). was an announcement that food was poisoned in large scale: fish; meat, egg, dairy product......almost everything to make sure what I bought were toxic food. A lot of people would be suffered. To control the situation, a hospital was closed.

In same month on 9/26/04, Mercury News reported that San Jose Medical Center would close on 12/9. "Can we live with only two?" the article asked the question with one of Santa Clara County's three trauma centers set to close.

I think the purpose was to concentrate the sick people to the remain hospital so Feds could effectively collect the data of their victims to control the development of their poison project.

The close of hospital had attracted other investors but no one succeeded to take over. "Possible hospital investor drops out". News said. (11/11/04. S.J.M.N.) Since the close of hospital was part of Feds poison project, no one could disturb it even there was a demand.

I was aware of this big poison project when I wrote the poison message #309. I arranged the news collection about toxic food and found one toxic news in 2003, one in 2004, there were three in February 2005. (see #310) Obviously four months after they announced large scale toxic food, many victims fell sick in early 2005 .That is why there were three articles about toxic food in one month. Published with unusual frequency to justify the recent outbreak of cancer patients.

Started from February this year, more food was contaminated by isotope. It's a tactic to continue the poison plan when toxic caused doctors' attention. Then we saw the "whooping cough" article in April.

This country is controlled by an evil group. They don't care the lives of its citizens. For a target they worried very much they could sacrifice the lives of many other people. They even designed a big project to study how to control majority population by toxic food. It's their tradition. We saw it from "Northwood" plan. I also allege they are the one behind "Oklahoma bombing" and "911 attack". For their interest they'll do anything.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

313. Breast feeding and breast cancer (5/22/05)

Postby kathaksung » Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:03 pm

313. Breast feeding and breast cancer (5/22/05)

Quote, "Rocket-Fuel Chemical Found in Breast Milk
Wed Feb 23, 7:55 AM ETBy Marla Cone Times Staff Writer

Scientists on Tuesday reported that perchlorate, a toxic component of rocket fuel, was contaminating virtually all samples of women's breast milk and its levels were found to be, on average, five times greater than in cow's milk.

The contaminant, which originates mostly at defense industry plants, previously had been detected in various food and water supplies around the country. But the study by Texas Tech University's Institute of Environmental and Human Health was the first to investigate breast milk.
The findings concern health experts because infants and fetuses are the most vulnerable to the thyroid-impairing effects of the chemical." (URL link at #310)

The February report about poisoned breast milk which threatens infants and fetuses reminded me another news related to breast feeding women several years ago. (I forgot the exact time when this news was reported) It said that scientists found that women who fed their infants with their own breast milk had much less chance to catch a breast cancer. Scientists couldn't find the reason. They only guess that the breast feeding may stimulate the women's immune system against cancer. So they suggest women to breast feed their infants instead of feeding by commercial milk.

I now have a different explanation.

1. Slow poison is vastly used as a murder weapon by Feds in this country. It used to cause cancer and made the death look like a natural disease. For women, most likely the result are breast cancer.

2. Feds avoid to poison breast feeding women because infants would have fallen sick before their mother. Infants have weak immune system. If doctors trace the toxic then the poison plot would have been revealed.

3. 1 and 2 explains why less breast feeding women caught breast cancer. Scientists didn't know what exactly happened and could only guess in their own way.

4. Feds succeeded before because the poison victim was used to be picked up selectively and poisoned individually. My case is unusual. I am aware of their tactic. To make sure the food I bought were poisoned, Feds poisoned food in large scale. This time they can't pick up victims. A lot of people were poisoned, include breast feeding women. So there is such a report.

5. Though the report said the sample came from different location, I think it was a cover up. How could rocket fuel in human's milk be five times more than in cow's milk? The purpose is to justify the outbreak of cancer in San Jose area and ensure the doctors there to believe the toxic is from nature. Unusual thing is, only in that month there were three articles talked about different toxic in food. In this great poison project, varies of toxic were used. The result is catastrophic. Those articles are emergent advice to doctors how to cure these sick people. It's easier to cure once you know the cause of illness. Seldom a doctor would have dreamed of it was caused by toxic - a deliberate poison.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

314. Cancer warning (5/27/05)

Postby kathaksung » Fri Jul 15, 2005 8:24 pm

314. Cancer warning (5/27/05)

When Feds started their large scale poisoning project, they expected there would be an outbreak of cancer patients. Started from early this year (or late last year?), there was a commercial in local Chinese TV. The familiar face of news broadcaster repeatedly told audience, "Recently many of my friends and relatives caught cancer. Watch your food. Having your vegetable evenly in 5 different color, red; yellow; green, (white?); purple."

The vegetable we consumed are mainly green. And I think it was also poisoned heavily. Feds advise people to turn onto other colors to reduce the chance to catch a cancer. Chinese TV station, of course, wouldn't have motive to produce this commercial, it must be financed by a government branch. The real people behind it, is Feds. I think.

I haven't seen this commercial any more after I wrote the message reveling the poison project.

In January, Mercury News reported, "Cancer is now the leading cause of death for Americans under age 85, surpassing deaths from heart disease for the first time, researchers said Wednesday." (1/20/05)

This was a psychological propaganda to justify the outbreak of cancer disease. Next month (February) they continued with detailed toxic articles. They had to do so to instruct doctors how to deal with the sudden surge of cancer patients.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

278. The start of nightmare (12/24)

Postby kathaksung » Sun Jul 24, 2005 6:56 pm

278. The start of nightmare (12/24)

In first years when I was in America, I rented a bedroom. I think I was a good tenant. I took some course in local community college in the morning. In the afternoon I had a swing shift job until midnight. On week-ends I did some business in Flea-market. Seven days a week, I seldom stayed at the house.

Probably seeing that I only took a sleep at night, the landlord suggested me to move to the garage so he could rent my bedroom off to someone else.

Though I was not an overcritical man, I was unhappy. The condition of a garage was too far away from a bedroom. The landlord's suggestion motivated me to have a house of my own. I started to look for a house.

My supervisor had just bought a house. When he knew about my bedroom story, he introduced his real-estate agent to me. After several round of trips to watch the house, I finally settled on the house which I live now.

That was the start of my America nightmare.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

279. Buy house (12/29)

Postby kathaksung » Fri Aug 05, 2005 7:10 pm

279. Buy house (12/29)

It was a four bedroom house emptied already. It looks like a duplex because two identical houses share one wall. But actually it was a townhouse because the garage attached to another neighbor. The price was 93,000. It was a bargain so I decided to buy it right away. The R.E. agent (real estate agent) told me the house was on process of pending sale. A buyer before me was waiting for the approving of a loan. If he failed to get a loan, then it was my turn. I was surprise how could she introduce me a house which was on a pending sale. She told me, "Don't worry. That buyer won't get the loan. The buyers before him failed too." I wondered how she was so sure about it.

On 11/16/1984, instructed by R.E. agent, I wrote the agreement of purchase and sell. The main point were:
1. Buyer put 20k down payment.
2. Buyer to assume the existing 30k VA loan.
3. 40k new conventional second loan. Seller to credit 2,000 for buyer's closing cost.
Thus I learned there was an "assumable loan" which could be transfered from sellers to buyers without any checks and examination from bank. The 2,000 credit offer was due to the seller was motivated to settle the deal. It was used to cover up the loan cost of buyer. It was probably demanded by former buyers. I took over the advantage.

In early December 1984, R.E. agent informed me the former buyer failed to get loan on time. It was my turn. On 12/11, I got the offer from seller. Next day I wrote a counter offer in which I proposed to put 60k down payment. The seller, instead to pay 2,000 in closing cost, to cut the price of house to 91,000.

Since that 2,000 amount was planned to pay in advance and the seller would lose nothing, she quickly accepted my counter offer.

What made me write the counter offer? Unemployment. The company I worked for was suddenly shut down. I would lose job. It was impossible for an unemployed to apply for a second loan from the bank. How I solved the problem? I turned on to my relatives.

It was Chinese tradition to help each other among family members. I called relatives, no one refused to help. From several thousand to tens of thousand, I quickly got enough money to cover up the second loan amount. One month later, I became a home-owner.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

280. Company shut down (1/4/05)

Postby kathaksung » Mon Aug 15, 2005 8:17 pm

280. Company shut down (1/4/05)

The company I worked for was Shugart Corp. It was named by its Creator's name - Shugart. The product of the company was hard disc drive. Shugart then sold his company and created another one - Seagate. (which is a popular technical company right now) However, the company still used its original name. Manager said Shugart Corp. had about two thousand employers. Its customers were big firms such like IBM, Wang Lab..... I worked in Shugart for more then two years until I bought the house.

In late 84, in a meeting manager said the business was not good so there might be some lay-off. He joked with us that, "Don't buy a new car. Don't buy a house." I felt that was pointing at me because I was buying a house then. In November and December when I was busy preparing to write the offer to purchase the house, the news of possible lay-off became the shut down of company. Every one had to go. Smile lost from manager's face. I still remembered my supervisor banged the desk with his fist, "Damn it, I just bought the house." People started to look for new job. They left one after another.

In newspaper I learned that many people got their pink slip in one day's notice. I had plenty of time for the psychological impact of unemployment. The day I left Shugart was 2/15/1985. One month after I bought the house. (1/15/85) I knew I would lose my job when I wrote the offer. What made me to buy house even if I knew I would be unemployed?

It was the incredible low price of the house. I have had a calculation. The mortgage payment of the 30k assumable loan was 360 dollars each month.(impounds included) Compare with the rent (250) I paid at that time it was only 110 extra. When I bought the house, I reserved one for myself. I could rent off the other bedrooms. In worst condition, the rent income would cover up the house expense. So even I had no job, I didn't worry about losing the house. My economic condition would be better if I bought. it. So what left was that private debt. I could concentrate to work to pay it off.

How low was the price? At that time, a 3 bedroom single house was about 130k. A house identical to mine was about 110k. That was the house next to me.

When R.E.agent showed me the house for the first time, she said, "Your neighbor is your supervisor." It seemed the two attached houses were on market about the same time. My supervisor bought the house just several months ago. The house next to him was on pending sale for several months. When we became neighbor, he told me he paid 110k and something for his house. He was surprised that the same house I paid was only 91k. "Why you had such a low price?"

I didn't seriously consider that question. I thought it was a coincidence that two neighbor houses were on market at same time. I thought it was a coincidence that lay off synchronized with the purchase of a house. I didn't ask why my house was almost 20% below an identical one at the same time. I only felt I was lucky to get such a bargain then.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

281. Former home owner (1/9)

Postby kathaksung » Mon Aug 29, 2005 7:44 pm

281. Former home owner (1/9)

When R.E.agent introduced the house to me, she said I got extra value for the security. The window of the house were installed with iron rail. There were extra iron rail door outside the wooden door. Later I had a look at my community, among one hundred houses, mine is the only one protected with iron rail. Obviously, the former home owner was very care about their security. But the iron rail couldn't protect former landlord's safety.

After I bought the house, I got the Grand Deed. On front page it printed, "***** ****, (seller's name) a widow, sold her house to Kat Hak Sung." So I knew the seller was a widow.

While I was busy to re-model the house, there was a knock at the door. It was a uniformed police lady. She came to visit Mrs. former home owner. When she knew the house had changed owner, she asked me to deliver a message to Mrs. former home owner about her visit. It was about Mrs.former home owner's pension.

Mrs. former home owner did leave her phone number on note board in kitchen. So I called her. She visited me later with a "thank you" fruit plate. She complained a lot about the trouble caused by buyers previous of me.

Eight years later, about in 1993 (?). Some one put a note on my car, asked me if I would sell it. At that time, I had two cars. One was a cargo van used in business. The other one was an automobile for general communication. Both car caused a bad feeling after driving. The van got normal after I installed metal plate around drive seat. The space of the driving seat of automobile was too narrow to install metal plate so I abandoned to drive that car. It was left on street for months, covered with dust.

The offer was from Feds, I thought. Most of the neighbor were occupied by agent and their people. Who would interest on a dirty car? They might want to take back the instruments they installed in my car when it was abandoned. Anyhow, I dare not to use that car again. So I called the number on that note and sold the automobile to the man.

A few days later, another note was found in mail box. It was same yellow stick note identical to the note offering to buy my car. This time it suggested to exchange his house with mine. I left that offer alone.

At that time, I was tortured by mysterious EM wave. Feds set up traps one after another. So the first thought came to my mind was: "Was it another trap? A house full of killing instrument prepared for me? There could be many traps in procedure to exchange houses." Then I recalled unusual events when I bought the house and since. With more experience with Feds, I gradually found the explanation for each coincidence. I started to realize it was the house I bought caused a nightmare.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

282. Not a coincidence (1/14)

Postby kathaksung » Mon Sep 05, 2005 7:28 pm

282. Not a coincidence (1/14)

After years of investigation, Feds should know I don't touch drugs and had no relationship to Mrs. Chen's case. Why did they keep on persecute on me? I wondered. The suggestion to exchange house tipped me there was some other cause. The following is my conclusion then:

1. Former home owners were target of the Feds. They worried about their safety. So they installed iron rail for protection. Former landlord still died.

2. Feds used to watch their target as close as they can. The best place to watch them was of course the neighborhood which shared wall with them. When the target was dead, his widow moved out, it was unnecessary to watch an empty house. So the surveillance team left the neighboring house. That was why two connected houses were almost on market at same time. My supervisor bought the house the Feds used to monitor.

3. Though I don't know what happened exactly, I speculate that the Feds lured former landlady to another house by a good bargain. But the payment depended on the sale of her original house. Feds developed a situation that potential buyers failed one after another. The grilled former landlady was eager for the money to pay the new house that she had to cut the price of house lower and even offered to pay 2000 dollars for buyer's loan cost.

4. Though the buyers previous of me likely worked for Feds, Feds didn't care at first when I was in waiting list. They thought they control everything. I was intimidated by lay off at first and then the shut down of the company. It didn't stop me because the price of house was too good. that my financial situation could be better after buying the house whatever I was employed or not. The shut down of company also motivated me for a private loan. So the usual way to control deal by loan was failed too. I got the house accidentally.

5. The visit of police lady about pension was a tactic to develop a meeting for me and former landlady. Feds used to arrange such meeting for their suspect to verify their relationship. If the police lady really wanted to talk to former landlady, she could get the phone number from me right away and direct called former home owner. Why asked some one else to deliver the message?

I realize this after the observation. The surveillance team used to change shift in a year or so. When that happens, our car would break down and had to be sent for repair. The leaving team must pick up their belongings in the car and arriving team to install theirs. With that it also come a dense visit of acquaintance. People rarely came suddenly show up. New arriving team wants to see the relationship of people they interested. When I realized it was a procedure of Feds, I recalled the visit of that police lady.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

331. Interest rate (8/2/05)

Postby kathaksung » Thu Sep 15, 2005 6:22 pm

331. Interest rate (8/2/05)

At first, I thought the "terror attack:" on US would take place in early August. Because Feds arranged a trip for my relatives at that time. The trip will cover New York and Canada from 8/6 to 8/13. Anytime if possible, Feds always arranged a trip in the case because it's easy to plant to arrest during a trip or murder by an accident. The latest travel Feds arranged was in April. In that plot, H.A. gave a final date to fix garage door on 4/17 which I viewed as action date of Feds. It coincides with the return date of my relatives. That China trip took almost one month vacation date on my relatives so I thought there would be no more trip for them this year. But when Feds needs it, people have to obey, so do the companies they work for. It reflects the eagerness of Feds. (When I use the word "Feds", I mean D.O.J. and its accessories FBI, DEA... , not Federal Reserve.)

Why pick up this time? Because on 8/9, Federal Reserve likely will once again raise the bench interest rate. As I have said, Feds bought a lot of houses in my case, so they desperately try to make the interest rate low to keep the house value high.

What did they do to keep the interest rate low?

1. Intimidation on financial group not to raise the rate too fast. A trick Feds is good at. Despite the covert intimidation, there was an open one in last August(2004) when Feds raised alert of certain financial area to orange code. When people doubted, they said it was from a seized computer of Al Qaida. The seized Al Qaida was finally proved an informant of Feds.

As a result, Federal Reserve collaborated. Greenspan dropped the interest rates from 6.5% to 1.75% in 2001. (A 4.75 drop in 12 months) House market boosted. Now the economic situation forces Federal Reserve to raise the interest rate to anti inflation and housing market balloon and maintain dollar from collapsing. Greenspan raised the rate in a measured (stagnant) step. (A raise of 2.25 in 12 months from 1% to 3.25%)

2. To reduce the employment. A high employment means a hot economy that enterprises will chase capital investment to deal with the increased wage, raw material etc. That will significantly push up the interest rate. .

Bush administration carries out a weak dollar policy which makes merchandise made in US cheaper to the foreign buyers. Dollar depreciates almost 1/3 to Euro and 20% to Japanese Yuen. Bush also cut the tax to let people have more money to spend. (It's a trick though. He lets people spend on their debt. He has a historical budget deficit. People have to pay off the debt later by paying more tax)

Do these policies work? Yes, it creates demand but does little to boost employment. Because Feds tried their best to reduce the employment. How?

(1) By outsourcing jobs. When it was criticized, they threw out a strange theory that outsourcing will benefit US economy in future.

(2) Stop hiring new workers. Big firms did not hire workers when demand increased. Same workers have to do more job. The result you could see from media in later 2003. When they beat the drum to say "Growth is now super-super strong compared to super strong,'', "U.S. 3rd-Qtr GDP Grew at 8.2% Rate, Fastest Since '84". They never mentioned about the jobs. They only said the productivity is increased by a double digit. In another word, 10 workers must do the job originally 11 workers did. For this phenomenon, they invent a new word:"Jobless recovery".

(3) Lay off working people.
Jobless recovery went into year2004. It was an election year. Bush's economic advisers predicted in early February that the US economy would add 2.6 million jobs in 2004. But that was against Feds' interest. Then we saw, "MCI to slash 7500 jobs"(5/11/04), "Dupont will lay off at least 2500" (4/9) "Seagate to cut 2,940 jobs" (May or June 04) "AT&T to cut 7,500 more jobs"(10/8) ..... At last, Bush was unable to make it a positive topic in his election campaign.

The explanation from Greenspan was that enterprises still lacked of confidence. That in this economy recovery, enterprises had an unusual conservative attitude to increase new capital investment and hiring more people.

Rare people know all these problem were caused by Feds. Bush's election, public's interest are out of consideration. Feds' interest, how small it is, is always at first place. They control CEO of big firms.(see "291. CEO and company (2/14/05)" and #292) So by outsourcing, controlling hiring and spending, Feds can handle the process of economy. Experts are confusing with the development of interest rate and over-heated housing market. They will understand it if they view it from another angle.

And now you may understand why China can maintain its currency exchange rate without being punished. It's all about inflation. A low inflation will help the interest rate low. That's what Feds want.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

332. Interest rate (2) (8/7/05)

Postby kathaksung » Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:29 am

332. Interest rate (2) (8/7/05)

To keep the interest rate low, Feds also

3. Reduce the money supply by containing the wage increase.

Re: US real wages fall at fastest rate in 14 years
By Christopher Swann in Washington
May 10 2005 17:59

Real wages in the US are falling at their fastest rate in 14 years, according to data surveyed by the Financial Times.
Inflation rose 3.1 per cent in the year to March but salaries climbed just 2.4 per cent, according to the Employment Cost Index. In the final three months of 2004, real wages fell by 0.9 per cent.

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/f269a8f4-c173- ... 511c8.html

4. Try to keep inflation rate at low figures. When the gasoline price and house price go up like a rocket, Feds suppresses the price of other merchandise to lower the inflation index.

(1) One obvious method is to reduce the price of automobile. The auto price plays an important role in inflation index. Be noticed that in recent two years, the price of automobiles hasn't risen. It even goes down despite the rising steel price. To maintain the inflation index low till the August plot, though exhausted, the auto manufacturers made a last ditch effort by pushing out "Employee discount" in July.

G.M. lost more than 1.1 billion in latest quarter in North America, overwhelming solid profit at financing unit GMAC and its operations in China, Europe and Latin America. Why G.M. could make a profit abroad but lost heavily in domestic market? Because its operation abroad is normal under economic principle while in US, it was operated under a twisted, artificial command. CEO of auto makers work not for the interest of share holders but for the interest of Inside Group.

(2) Keep the exchange rate of Chinese Yuen with US dollar.

Cheap merchandise from China keep US inflation low. But it also caused a large trade deficit with China which will hurt US economy in long run. For years, there is a big US and international pressure on China to urge it abandoning the fixed currency rate policy. China didn't follow. Because it is covertly supported by Inside Group. The threat of trade punishment is never carried out. Greenspan even defends China by saying that the appreciated Chinese Yuen has little help to improve US economy.

In early May, media reported that some financial firm predicted China would raise its currency value in mid May. One news among the reports caught my eye. It was a sentence: "Gold Sach firmly predicts that China will re-value its currency on May 18." For the first time it strengthened my belief that the re-value of Chinese currency related to a secret deal between the secret police of two countries. I knew Feds prefer the current situation of Chinese currency because it keeps US interest rate low. But did they have a secret deal?

I had thought 5/19(Thursday) was an action date of Feds. (H.A. letter of "overgrown tree" set the last date to fix was 5/19) The collaborate plan should be carried out at about same time. The most important thing was the word "Gold Sach". In my experience, stock market is another main cash register where Feds withdraw money from. In the period when stock went bull (1999-2000), I observed Gold Sach was the firm which gave signal to Feds in stock trading.(when to buy or sell) In my opinion, this firm has close relationship with Feds. It must have inside information that China would raise its currency value on 5/18.

May plot went sour. So did Gold Sach's prediction.

Then it came 7/21, the second London bombing. There was no death this time because the master bombing in US didn't take place to the plan. It also came with the re-value of Chinese currency. A 2% adjustment, far from 10% to 15% which US demanded. Because US interest rate still has to be kept in low. But it confirms my belief: They had relationship to the plan of D.O.J.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

333. Manipulate long term interest rate ( 8/12/05)

Postby kathaksung » Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:10 pm

333. Manipulate long term interest rate ( 8/12/05)

Fourteen months ago, when Federal benchmark interest rate was at 45 years low of 1%, the interest of 10 year bond (Federal treasure 10 year note) was 4.8% and the 30 year mortgage rate was about 5.6%. After Federal interest rate being raised from 1% to 3.5%, the 10 year bond rate is about 4.3% and the 30 year mortgage rate is about 5.8%. Either has little change or even has a drop.

To economic rule, long term interest rate always follows the track of short term rate. Now it is moving in a conflict way. Federal Reserve raised the interest rate 10 times, the median price of housing market goes to higher and higher. Economists puzzled. Even Alan Greenspan said that he does not have a good explanation why the long term interest rates fall when the Reserve has been raising short term rates.

Rare people know it's the work of Feds. (Inside group such like D.O.J., FBI and DEA) They hold a large quantity real estates so they resist any change that will influence rising house price. The tactic they used also include the following:

1. Keep the rate of 10 year Federal treasure note low by letting foreign countries (mainly Japan and China) buying a large quantities of US Treasuries. 10 year bonds is the main factor to influence the 30 years mortgage rate.

2. Expand the bond market of home mortgage. Japanese and Chinese government continually buy in the bonds issued by Gunnie Mae(US Government National Mortgage Association), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Supply a large quantity of low interest fund to home mortgage company.

Japan is a puppet of US. It follows the order of Inside Group. China, has secret deal with Feds, collaborate in any side related to framed case.

3. Intimidate Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae to expand the home mortgage lending business. In 2003 and 2004, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae suffered scandal of account manipulation and financial report problem. Top executives were ousted. As a result, in 2005, the two firms raise the ceiling of single family house mortgage from 333.7k to 359.65k. It said that will help consumers to buy high price house. It also flame the heated house market.

There is always a purpose when a scandal revealed. We learned it from Lewinsky scandal and Watergate scandal. And the result of scandal on Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae helped to create a housing bubble. It developed a potential crisis that in this April Greenspan had to urge Congress to restrict the multi billion-dollar holdings of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, warning that their huge debt could imperil US financial markets.

A housing bubble is formed. It will dragged US economy into a quagmire in future. All for the interest of Feds.
kathaksung
Statesman
Statesman
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:46 am
Location: San Jose, Ca.

PreviousNext

Return to Fascist Tyranny in America

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron